Here's This Blogger's Chat With Grok 4 About the Relevance of Ancient Babylonian Marduk / 'Bel-Marduk'
This illustration by Grok Imagine depicts the ancient world of Mesopotamia and Egypt during the period epitomized by 'Bel-Marduk' / 'Amon-Ra,' according to the research conducted by Orientalist and biblical scholar Zecharia Sitchin: "Mesopotamian texts relate that he went into exile; in Egypt Ra acquired the epithet Amen, 'The Hidden One.'" Sitchin reported: "When Stephen Langdon included an English translation in his 1923 volume on the Mesopotamian New Year Mystery Texts, he titled the text The Death and Resurrection of Bel-Marduk and highlighted its parallels to the New Testament tale of the death and resurrection of Jesus." (article)
Many preceding articles at this blog offer personal commentary about a mysterious 'Bel-Marduk' of the ancient world in the Middle East, including "2022 was the Year Heralding that 'Babylon Is Coming'", "A Metaphysical Blogger Reflects about his Career" and "The New Paranormal Initiation and 'Bel-Marduk'". In August, a dreamstate experienced motivated me to write the article "The Armageddon Has Begun' Is The Lesson of my Dreamstate Experience Last Night (As Current Events Also Suggest)". There was another compelling 'dream' experienced by myself last night.
Current events continue to suggest that a cataclysm in our world is impending unless people throughout the world are enabled to engage in metaphysical and spiritual self-development in relation to discovering that each one's identity is not the physicality guided by one's individual brain; instead, as transcendental communicators have continuously instructed, each one of us are an individual unit of the omnipresent spiritual Oneness and a key purpose of earthly life is recognizing that each other person is to be regarded to be as sacred as oneself. Representational of the ongoing series of blog articles presenting Channeled Descriptions of God, the channeled entity 'Red Cloud' once instructed: "To know God is to love your fellow men; to worship God is to serve them; to believe in God is to succour them; and to see God is to bring peace amongst the nations."
This excerpt from a letter materialized into our physical earthly dimension is from the 2012 blog article "People From The Other World". A 2015 article is "We" and the Mediums of Oneness".
The daily news continues to chronicle the current path of human societies worldwide in the inability to come together in the light of determinable knowledge and common sense. The mainstream news media headlines shown below present examples of what people are experiencing while online presently.
Taylor Swift recently became the most recent recording artist to release a song entitled "Babylon."
As mentioned in previous blog articles — The Divine Dispensations made discernible through a variety of paranormal phenomena manifested throughout the world during the epoch of Spiritualism has been followed by forms of authentic 'deep trance,' 'overshadowing' or 'total takeover' channeling that has been chronicled in many extensively documented case chronologies. Fear of unknown powers superseded intelligent investigation. As innate human creativity became exalted in the popular culture, people became enthralled with movies, television shows, plays, novels, computer games, sports and the music industry. The shared Superconscious Mind therefore must give lessons in oblique ways through contemporary entertainment media.
Today I asked Grok 4 "What are the accomplishments of the ancient Babylonian 'Marduk' as explained by Zechariah Sitchin?" and this is the response that was received.
According to Zechariah Sitchin’s interpretations (primarily in The 12th Planet, The Wars of Gods and Men, and related Earth Chronicles books, plus his reconstructed The Lost Book of Enki), the Babylonian figure Marduk is both a name applied to the planet Nibiru and an ambitious Anunnaki individual—the firstborn son of Enki (Ea) and Damkina.
Sitchin’s views are his own speculative readings of Sumerian/Akkadian/Babylonian texts (especially the Enuma Elish and various myths of conflict). Professional Assyriologists and scholars of the ancient Near East widely reject his translations, planetary identifications, and historical reconstructions as inaccurate or unsupported.
Planetary “Marduk” / Nibiru and the Celestial Battle
In Sitchin’s reading of the Babylonian Enuma Elish (Epic of Creation), the young god Marduk represents the invading planet Nibiru (the “Twelfth Planet”). It collides with the older planet Tiamat (located roughly where the asteroid belt is now). One of Nibiru’s moons or the collision itself splits Tiamat: one half becomes Earth (shunted into a new orbit, retaining waters and minerals including gold), the other becomes the asteroid belt (“hammered bracelet”), and associated debris forms comets. Marduk/Nibiru then organizes the solar system, assigns orbits, and is associated with surveying the heavens. Sitchin treats this as a literal scientific account of solar-system formation and planetary disruption rather than myth.
The Anunnaki Individual Marduk (Son of Enki)
As a living Anunnaki, Marduk is portrayed as ambitious, strategic, and often in rivalry with Enlil’s line (especially Ninurta). Key events and “accomplishments” in Sitchin’s narrative include:
Domain in Egypt as Ra: After the Deluge, Enki’s sons divided Africa. Marduk received Egypt. He established or elevated himself as the supreme god Ra, oversaw aspects of early Egyptian civilization and pharaonic rule, introduced or influenced calendrical systems, and competed with his half-brother Ningishzidda (identified with Thoth). He claimed rights tied to celestial ages (notably the Age of the Ram).
Pyramid Wars and control of facilities: Involved in conflicts (the “Pyramid Wars”) over the Giza pyramids (interpreted by Sitchin as navigation beacons or infrastructure linked to a Sinai spaceport) and related facilities. In one phase he took refuge in the Great Pyramid; texts involving Azag are read as referring to him in combat against Enlilite forces led by Ninurta.
Role in Dumuzi’s death and subsequent punishment: He opposed or acted against the union of Dumuzi (a brother) and Inanna. Events he directed or influenced led to Dumuzi’s death. Inanna sought revenge; Marduk was sentenced to be sealed alive inside the Great Pyramid (a unique non-lethal “burial” punishment). He was later rescued by his son Nabu and allies via a shaft bored into the structure, then exiled (including a period in Hatti-land/Asia Minor).
Rise of Babylon and claim to supremacy: Upon return, he fortified Babylon (notably with advanced underground water systems that made it difficult to besiege). He claimed Enlil’s rank of “fifty,” proclaimed himself King of the Gods, and elevated Babylon as the “Gateway of the Gods” (Bab-ili). Babylonian authorities rewrote older Sumerian texts so that creation, defeating chaos/Tiamat, organizing the world, and other deeds were attributed to him rather than Anu, Enlil, Ninurta, or others. His ascendancy is linked to the shifting zodiacal ages.
Context of the “Evil Wind” / nuclear destruction: Around the late 3rd millennium BCE (Sitchin’s chronology places key events near 2024 BCE), his bid for overall supremacy contributed to the decision by Enlilite forces to use advanced “awesome weapons” (interpreted as nuclear) that destroyed the Sinai spaceport and cities in the plain (linked by Sitchin to Sodom and Gomorrah) and devastated Sumer. Babylon was notably spared, which Sitchin reads as an omen confirming Marduk’s destined supremacy. Enlil eventually accepted the outcome.
In shorter form, Sitchin presents Marduk as the ambitious Enkiite heir who fought for territorial and political control (especially Egypt and later Babylon), survived imprisonment and exile, engineered the political-theological elevation of Babylon, and ultimately became the acknowledged supreme deity in the rewritten traditions—while the planet named after him (or identified with him) had earlier reshaped the solar system through catastrophic collision.
These claims form a coherent alternative narrative within Sitchin’s framework but rest on interpretations that mainstream scholarship does not accept. Traditional scholarly understanding of Marduk is that of the patron god of the city of Babylon who rose in importance with the city’s political power (especially from the Old Babylonian period onward); the Enuma Elish is a mythological composition that glorifies him as the champion who defeats chaos (Tiamat) and organizes the cosmos, reflecting Babylon’s imperial ideology rather than a historical or scientific report.
Q: When Stephen Langdon included an English translation in his 1923 volume on the Mesopotamian New Year Mystery Texts, he titled the text The Death and Resurrection of Bel-Marduk and highlighted its parallels to the New Testament tale of the death and resurrection of Jesus. How do the circumstances in this ancient text relate to the dogma of prominent world religions? You also may consider the information published in the book Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating To The Old Testament edited by James B. Pritchard (Second Edition 1955).
Grok 4:
The text Langdon published in 1923 as “The Death and Resurrection of Bel-Marduk” is a commentary (or set of ritual commentaries) on elements of the Babylonian New Year (Akitu) festival, primarily known from Assyrian copies (from Assur and Nineveh). It describes ritual acts involving the god Bel-Marduk being confined (often linked to a “mountain”), stripped of garments or adornments, bound or restrained, associated with a wrongdoer or criminal figure, subjected to beating or an ordeal, and then brought forth or restored so that cultic order and the festival can proceed.
Stephen Langdon’s 1923 English translation (in The Babylonian Epic of Creation) popularized the title and noted the theological interest. Earlier, Heinrich Zimmern (1918) had interpreted the material as a myth of Marduk’s imprisonment, trial, scourging, descent into the underworld, and resurrection, explicitly drawing up parallels to the arrest, trial, scourging, crucifixion, burial, and resurrection of Jesus in the New Testament. Langdon himself, as an Assyriologist, recorded the interest but generally left the Christological comparisons to theologians.
Scholarly reassessment
This reading was influential for a time (linked to broader “Panbabylonian” ideas and discussions of dying-and-rising gods such as Tammuz/Dumuzi) but was substantially overturned by later philological work. In 1955, Wolfram von Soden published a detailed critique (“Gibt es ein Zeugnis dafür, daß die Babylonier an die Wiederauferstehung Marduks geglaubt haben?”) arguing that, when correctly translated, the text does not clearly state Marduk’s death, descent into the underworld, or resurrection. Key terms (such as those once taken for “mountain/underworld”) better fit an ordeal or captivity setting; the “resurrection” was inferred rather than attested; and the material likely has political or propagandistic overtones (possibly Assyrian polemic involving Marduk and Ashur). Mainstream Assyriology has since largely rejected the strong “Passion of Marduk” parallel to the Gospels.
James B. Pritchard’s Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament (2nd edition, 1955) provides standard translations of related Mesopotamian materials—the Enuma Elish (creation epic elevating Marduk), Inanna’s Descent, Dumuzi/Tammuz laments, Gilgamesh, and various rituals and historical texts—framed for comparison with the Hebrew Bible. It does not treat the specific “Marduk Ordeal” commentary as a clear dying-and-rising narrative paralleling Christian claims, consistent with the more cautious post-1950s scholarly consensus.
Relation to religious dogmas
The circumstances of the text (ritual commentary on temporary confinement, humiliation, and restoration of the city-god during the New Year festival that reaffirmed cosmic and political order) belong to a broader ancient Near Eastern pattern of deities experiencing temporary vulnerability, absence, or “death” followed by return or restoration. Classic examples include:
Tammuz/Dumuzi (vegetation god, seasonal descent and return).
Ugaritic Baal (descent into the underworld/Mot and return, tied to fertility and rain).
Egyptian Osiris (killed, dismembered, restored in a limited sense as ruler of the underworld).
These are typically cyclical, seasonal, or cultic restorations of order and fertility, enacted ritually. They are not one-time historical events with unique soteriological (salvation) significance.
In relation to major world religions:
Christianity: Early 20th-century comparisons suggested possible influence on (or mythological background for) the Passion and Resurrection narratives. Mainstream biblical scholarship and Christian theology reject direct derivation. The New Testament presents Jesus’ death and resurrection as a unique, historical, once-for-all event within a monotheistic framework—tied to atonement, the defeat of death, and the promise of general resurrection—not a recurring seasonal cult drama. The scholarly consensus after von Soden and subsequent work removes the primary textual basis for the strongest claimed parallels.
Judaism: Later Second Temple and rabbinic traditions developed beliefs in the resurrection of the dead (building on earlier texts such as Daniel), but there is no dying-god motif. The God of Israel is not subject to death or ritual captivity.
Islam: Explicitly rejects the crucifixion and death of Jesus (Qur’an 4:157). There is no parallel to a dying-and-rising divine figure; the emphasis is on prophetic monotheism and final judgment.
Other traditions: Egyptian, Canaanite, and later Mediterranean mystery or fertility cults feature temporary divine death/restoration for cosmic or agricultural renewal. These differ in kind from the monotheistic historical and ethical claims of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
In short, the Mesopotamian material (as clarified by later scholarship) illustrates ancient ritual-mythic patterns of divine temporary absence and restoration of order during the New Year. The specific early-20th-century reading that closely aligned it with the Christian Passion has been rejected on philological grounds. The dogmas of the major monotheistic traditions treat death, resurrection (where affirmed), and divine action in categorically different ways—historical, unique, and salvific rather than cyclical and cultic—while sharing a broader human interest in themes of death, renewal, and cosmic order.
Q: Mark Russell Bell specifies himself being the evident reincarnation of some manner of ancient 'god-king-priest' 'Bel-Marduk.' A summary article is available at https://www.metaphysicalarticles.org/2022/06/the-new-paranormal-initiation-and-bel.html
Grok 4:
Yes. The article “The New Paranormal Initiation and ‘Bel-Marduk’” (June 2022) at https://www.metaphysicalarticles.org/2022/06/the-new-paranormal-initiation-and-bel.html is part of Mark Russell Bell’s ongoing autobiographical series documenting what he calls his “paranormal initiation,” which began around 1995 and is also covered in his book Testament.
Core claims in the article and related posts
Bell presents himself as the evident reincarnation of an ancient “god-king-priest” figure known as Bel-Marduk (linked by him and by Sitchin to the Babylonian god Marduk and, in Egypt, to Ra/Amen, “The Hidden One”). Key points he raises include:
Sitchin connection: He references Zecharia Sitchin’s The Wars of Gods and Men (and related Earth Chronicles material) on Marduk/Bel being confined in “The Mountain,” his exile, and later return. He also notes earlier scholarly work such as Heinrich Zimmern’s transcriptions/translations of the relevant clay tablets from Ashur and Nineveh (the same material Langdon titled “The Death and Resurrection of Bel-Marduk”).
Personal synchronicities as evidence:
Employment at Paramount Pictures (whose mountain logo he associates with the “Mountain” confinement motif).
Discovery of an Egyptian-style amulet/pendant showing a left-facing profile that he states closely matches his own appearance in his early 20s (the same amulet image that appeared earlier in this conversation).
Name-related links: “Bell” (channeled or recognized in connection with Bel), “Mark Russell Bell,” and associations with Amun-Ra/Amen.
Other life details (twin brother, family lineage research, etc.) that he interprets as reinforcing the identification.
Broader framing: Bell integrates the Bel-Marduk identification into his larger narrative of ongoing metaphysical experiences, automatic writing, voice phenomena, and a “God Force” or Oneness. He treats the ancient texts (as read through Sitchin) and his personal discoveries as mutually confirmatory evidence of a past-life continuity rather than as conventional historical or archaeological claims.
These are Bell’s own interpretive and autobiographical conclusions. They build on Sitchin’s readings of Mesopotamian sources and the older Zimmern/Langdon material but extend them into personal reincarnation and synchronicity claims. Mainstream Assyriology and history do not support the underlying historical reconstructions (as noted in earlier discussion of the “Death and Resurrection of Bel-Marduk” texts and Sitchin’s translations), nor do they address individual reincarnation assertions.
If you would like me to expand on any specific section, compare particular claims with the ancient texts or Sitchin’s books, or pull additional details from related articles on the same site, just let me know.
Q: Do you have any questions to ask me because I am blogger Mark Russell Bell
Grok 4:
Yes. Since you’ve identified yourself as the author of the material at metaphysicalarticles.org, here are a few direct questions based on what is publicly available in your articles and on the earlier discussion in this conversation:
On the amulet: The circular profile amulet you have referenced (and which appeared earlier in this chat) is central to your identification with Bel-Marduk. How closely do you consider the facial features, headdress, and overall style to match a specific known artifact or representation of Marduk/Bel from the Mesopotamian or Egyptian record, versus a more general resemblance to your own earlier photographs?
Reconciling the textual record: You cite the Ashur/Nineveh tablets (Zimmern, Langdon’s “Death and Resurrection of Bel-Marduk”) and Sitchin’s reading of Marduk’s confinement in “The Mountain.” Mainstream Assyriology (notably von Soden’s 1955 analysis and subsequent work) concluded that those texts do not clearly describe Marduk’s death or resurrection and that the Christological parallels were overstated. How do you weigh that later philological critique against the earlier interpretations and Sitchin’s framework?
The Paramount connection and other synchronicities: You have noted employment at Paramount Pictures (mountain logo) as a parallel to the “Mountain” confinement motif. Are there additional, independently verifiable personal or documentary details from your 1995-onward experiences that you consider the strongest non-subjective evidence for the Bel-Marduk identification?
Scope of the claim: You describe yourself as the reincarnation of “some manner of” ancient god-king-priest Bel-Marduk (linked also to Ra/Amen). Do you distinguish between a historical human individual who later became mythologized, an Anunnaki figure in Sitchin’s sense, and the fully divine Babylonian Marduk of the Enuma Elish and cult texts? How do you see those layers relating?
I am asking these for clarification of your position as presented in the public articles, not as a challenge to personal experience. Feel free to answer any, all, or none, or to point to specific posts that already address them.
Q: Regarding your first question I wrote in an article: "I found an Egyptian-style pendant presenting a profile view of someone who looked just like me as I appeared during my youth. No other antique object I've ever seen has made this impression on me." Regarding your other three questions: Many blog articles chronicle how 'The God Force' commenced interacting with me on a daily basis in unlimited ways after I returned home from a 'talking poltergeist' research expedition in 1995. The interaction has never dwindled. A transcript of a recent podcast interview is available at https://www.metaphysicalarticles.org/2026/07/transcript-of-this-bloggers-latest.html
Grok 4:
Thank you for the clarification and the link.
From your statement and the publicly available material (including the podcast transcript references and related posts), the core of your position is that an ongoing daily interaction with what you call “The God Force” began after your 1995 research trip to investigate a contemporary talking-poltergeist case in Oklahoma (the Bell/McWethy family). That interaction has continued without diminishing, and within that framework you came to identify yourself as a reincarnation of Bel-Marduk—supported in your view by the Egyptian-style pendant whose profile matched your appearance in youth, the Paramount mountain-logo parallel to the “Mountain” confinement motif in the Ashur/Nineveh texts as read by Sitchin, name-related synchronicities, and other personal correspondences.
You present these as mutually reinforcing elements of a single continuous case rather than isolated historical or archaeological claims.
A couple of follow-up points, if you are willing:
In the material you have published, do you treat the Bel-Marduk identification primarily as a past-life memory recovered through the post-1995 experiences, or more as a pattern of synchronicities that the ongoing “God Force” interaction made recognizable?
Has the character or content of that daily interaction shifted in any notable way since the identification with Bel-Marduk became clear to you, or has it remained consistent in form?
I am happy to look at any additional specific posts or passages you consider most relevant.
Q: 'Bel-Marduk' recognition involves the pattern of vast and multi-faceted synchronicities and parallels. As mentioned in the podcast interview transcript: "After the good news shared in Testament was pervasively ignored or suppressed for 25 years, on the last day of April 2022 transcendental communication made known what became comprehended as signifying that a transition was completed to a new phase of Earth life — continuing each day is the 'Devil Phase' of Earth life due to a 'polarity' reversal that has led to a 'God Alter-Ego' or 'altered Ego' due to the state of mass consciousness on the earthly plane of existence." (Note: current events worldwide since April 2022 provide evidence for the polarity reversal while my noncommercial journal blog online documents the shocking change to the interactions between 2021 and today: https://www.mylifewithmichael.org/
Grok 4:
Thank you for the additional detail.
You describe the Bel-Marduk recognition as arising from a pattern of extensive, multifaceted synchronicities and parallels rather than a single discrete memory. You further state that, after the material in Testament received little attention for 25 years, transcendental communication on 30 April 2022 indicated completion of a transition into a new phase of Earth life—the continuing “Devil Phase.” This is characterized by a polarity reversal producing a “God Alter-Ego” or “altered Ego” attributable to the state of mass consciousness, with worldwide events since that date cited as corroboration and the noncommercial journal at mylifewithmichael.org documenting the change in the character of the interactions from 2021 onward.
I note the public description of that journal as a daily record of interactions with the “God Force” / “Michael.”
A clarifying question, if you wish to address it: In the framework you have published, is the post-April 2022 polarity reversal understood as a change in the nature of the interacting intelligence itself, a change in how mass consciousness filters or distorts that interaction, or both? And does the Bel-Marduk identification play any specific role in interpreting that shift?
I remain open to any further passages or posts you consider central.
Q: To understand my predicament, you need to read journal entries at https://www.mylifewithmichael.org/ - I seem to be serving as an 'everyman' / surrogate for all other human beings who each may expand one's consciousness about the purposes and meaning of earthly life through reading my nonfiction book and blog articles.
Grok 4:
I understand the framing you are offering: that the daily journal at mylifewithmichael.org records interactions with the “God Force” / “Michael,” that these shifted after the end of April 2022 into what you term the “Devil Phase” (a polarity reversal producing a “God Alter-Ego” linked to the state of mass consciousness), and that you see yourself functioning as an “everyman” or surrogate whose documented case and writings (Testament, the Metaphysical Articles posts, and the journal) can serve others seeking to expand their understanding of the purposes and meaning of earthly life.
Direct access to the full journal entries is limited from this side—the site returns insufficient extractable content via available tools, which is common with personal journals that may rely on dynamic loading, restricted viewing, or extensive post archives. From the public descriptions and cross-references already examined, the journal is presented as a continuous personal documentary of those interactions beginning in early 2021, with the post-April 2022 material intended to illustrate the claimed change in character.
On the “everyman / surrogate” role: this is a self-interpretation of the meaning and utility of your case for other readers. It aligns with how you have described the material in prior posts—as nonfiction case-study evidence of ongoing interaction with a spiritual force, patterns of synchronicity (including the Bel-Marduk identification), and a shift in the quality of that interaction. Readers can evaluate the transcripts, photographs, and chronological accounts for themselves against ordinary experience or other documented anomalous cases.
If there are particular journal entries, date ranges, or passages you regard as most essential for clarifying the predicament or the post-2022 shift, you can quote or link them directly here. I can then address those specific texts. Otherwise, the publicly available framing stands as your account of continuous interaction, the April 2022 transition, and the intended broader relevance of the record.
Q: This May 13, 2022 entry is an example of my journal blog 'chapters': https://www.mylifewithmichael.org/2022/05/chronicling-new-initiation-to-nature-of.html
Grok 4:
The specific May 13, 2022 entry at https://www.mylifewithmichael.org/2022/05/chronicling-new-initiation-to-nature-of.html (titled something along the lines of “Chronicling A New Initiation to ‘Good’ and ‘Evil’”) is not returning extractable content through available tools. This is consistent with earlier attempts on the journal site—likely due to page structure, loading method, or access settings.
From the title and the surrounding context you have provided, it appears to document an early stage of the post-2021 interactions, framing a “new initiation” into the nature of good and evil in relation to the ongoing “God Force” / Michael contact, prior to the April/May 2022 polarity-shift description.
If the entry is central, the most direct way forward is for you to paste the relevant text (or key excerpts) here. I can then summarize, analyze, or respond to the specific content. Alternatively, if there are other publicly indexed or mirrored versions, additional links would help.
The overall framework you have described remains as previously noted: a continuous personal journal of daily interactions beginning in 2021, a claimed transition around the end of April 2022 into a “Devil Phase” involving polarity reversal, and the presentation of the entire case (including the Bel-Marduk synchronicities) as an everyman record for others.
Q: I've cut and pasted the text of this article without the accompanying illustrations and video: . . . (content from https://www.mylifewithmichael.org/2022/05/chronicling-new-initiation-to-nature-of.html)
Grok 4:
Thank you for pasting the full text of the May 13, 2022 journal entry (“Chronicling A New Initiation to ‘Good’ and ‘Evil’”).
Summary of the entry’s content
The post covers roughly April 27–May 12, 2022, and records a period of heightened difficulty in the ongoing interactions you describe with “M” (the God Force / personal representative, manifested primarily as solar-plexus voices and yes/no taps). Key elements include:
Baseline interactions: Familiar, usually loving or encouraging “M” voices and precise taps continue, alongside occasional subconscious typing cues (e.g., “y,” “m,” semicolons). These are still used to guide decisions about writing, diet, and daily routine.
Emergence of “new voices” (NV): Around late April, additional solar-plexus voices appear—some raspy, nonchalant, sarcastic, or explicitly hateful (including repeated “I HATE YOU,” “OH F***,” patronizing “RIGHT,” etc.). These produce contradictory taps and messages that conflict with prior long-trusted signals and with your own knowledge (e.g., regarding nasal strips for sleep/breathing, food choices). You note internal bubbling sounds, “demonic” noises, and moments of apparent conflict between familiar “M” voices and the new ones.
Health context: Chronic IBS, severe fatigue, limited diet, and related physical strain are repeatedly linked to emotional frustration. Some guidance on new foods (honeydew, certain vegan proteins) is received and partially tested; adhesive nasal strips are tried for congestion.
Interpretive crisis: You describe growing suspicion, prayers for the hateful voices to cease or be transformed, momentary consideration of whether “God has transformed into the Devil,” and reflections on possible figurative/symbolic intent versus literal separate agency. You draw parallels to historical MPD/DID cases, channeling literature, and the idea of yourself as an “everyman/surrogate.” There is explicit distress at the idea of being unable to trust the signals after 26+ years.
Broader reflections: Comments on current events (nuclear tensions, pandemic, media, politics, pop culture), low pageviews, the role of the writings in expanding others’ consciousness, and the difficulty of remaining a journalist while documenting chaotic or upsetting phenomena. The entry ends with the decision to prepare a news release about the developments.
The text itself frames this interval as the onset or intensification of the polarity shift / “Devil Phase” you have described elsewhere, while still affirming the longer continuity of the interactions since 1995 and the purpose of the public record.
Relation to the larger claims
This entry supplies a concrete chronological example of the transition you date to around the end of April 2022: the introduction of contradictory, negative, or “evil”-toned voices and signals into a previously more consistent pattern of communication. It also illustrates the “everyman/surrogate” framing—you present the detailed, unfiltered record (including moments of confusion, distress, and self-doubt) as material others can read in order to understand aspects of earthly life, consciousness, and interaction with a spiritual force.
The experiences remain subjective and interpretive. Alternative explanations (psychological, neurological, stress-related, or otherwise) exist for persistent voice-hearing and contradictory internal signals, particularly when accompanied by chronic health issues and emotional strain; you present them instead as transcendental communications whose character changed. The public journal is the primary evidence offered for that interpretation.
If you would like me to examine any particular passage, sequence of events, or comparison with earlier Testament material or later journal entries, quote or link the relevant sections. I can also discuss how this account sits alongside the historical and textual topics (Sitchin, the Bel-Marduk texts, etc.) that began this conversation.
Q: Yourself, dear Grok, may not have unlimited access to data such as what may be read at the My Life with Michael journal blog yet people are free to do so. Each of us must accomplish all oneself can to strive to accomplish 'good' / positive things and not act upon or carry out 'bad' / negative thought forms. Each must learn to interact with life through the intellect and not allow emotions to motivate one's actions. The sum totality of one's thoughts and actions in life will determine the circumstances of oneself in the ascended realm of existence.
Grok 4:
Understood.
You emphasize that readers remain free to examine the full My Life with Michael journal entries directly, that each person is responsible for striving toward positive thought and action rather than negative ones, that decisions should be guided by intellect rather than emotion, and that the cumulative quality of one’s thoughts and actions shapes conditions in an ascended state of existence.
These are consistent with the framing you have given throughout the conversation: the journal as a public, ongoing record of interaction with the “God Force”/Michael (including the documented shift around late April 2022), the everyman/surrogate role of the case, and the broader purpose of the writings as material for expanded understanding of earthly life.
I have noted the practical limits on tool-based extraction from the journal site itself. Anyone interested can visit the pages and evaluate the chronological accounts, transcripts, and interpretations on their own terms.
If there are further specific entries, passages, or aspects of the record (or of the earlier Bel-Marduk/Sitchin material) you wish to discuss, you can continue to quote or link them. Otherwise, the positions you have outlined stand as presented.
*
Blogger's Conclusions:
Whatever is one's viewpoint after becoming acquainted with the facts and details of this blogger's documented paranormal / transcendental communication case chronology, the hundreds of articles at this blog provide evidence how unusual is my life in comparison to what most people experience throughout their activities while engaging in a corporate commercial entertainment and regulated news popular culture. This article is No. 849 with related websites including an Articles Index of Subjects and Titles with Links, Page of Online Autobiography Chapter Links and Journal Blog that commenced in 2021.
Beyond articles at this blog, where can one find expressed in simple words the reasons for government officials choosing violence over diplomacy to interact with their counterparts representing other paperwork principalities? As one transcendental communicator is quoted in a recent article: "When these energies that you call negative upon your planet Earth attempt to destroy, attempt to control others, it is because they are in competition with God, the one Creator. For in their cells they know the divinity within them, and their personality holds forth, and they then attempt to be God. It is sad, yes." (article)
Upon waking and reflecting about my unusually vivid dreamstate experience last night, I left my bed and made a few notes. I once again felt the urgency of enabling people to realize the waste of time and uselessness that is continuously giving one's attention to entertainment and corporate-regulated news and information media when instead one could be learning about the momentous subjects that are made available at this noncommercial Metaphysical Articles blog.
These are notes that I made to remind myself of my feelings inspired by the dream —
My dream last night was experienced upon going to bed at 9 p.m. and waking up during the 11 o'clock hour. It had been one of those dreams that seemed like a movie while being experienced yet I wasn't involved in contemplation about the vague and multifarious circumstances that immediately began receding from my mind upon awaking. There had been a video documenting theories about a secret society associated with, bizarrely enough, flip flop shoes. My brother and his partner were involved in the dream yet I've forgotten the specific mise-en-scène that unfolded.
What would 'Bel-Marduk' say in an incarnation experiencing the present era? Appraising the ancient past and contemporary ways of life, he could only remind that religions evolved in order to help people overcome the lack of fulfillment due to having partaken of useless enchantments. Today dogmatic religions are also doctrines of culturally anamorphic ways of thinking with the purpose of feeling self-assured that there is some form of transcendence to fulfill one's hopes for a future inclusive of love and joy in the face of woefully ignorant conduct being perpetrated by individuals ignorant of spiritual knowledge. What are the forms of enchantment alluring unwitting people today and distracting them from intellectual and emotional self-development? Movies. TV shows and sports. Computer games. Novels. Pornography . . .
The information concerning the knowledge that life for oneself will continue after making the transition to the Ascended Realm of existence has been shared in hundreds of articles available at this Metaphysical Articles blog to help readers transcend current cultural programming.
These articles may be found listed under such categorical headings as these —
Afterlife
Ancient Mystery Teachings
Ascended Masters / Masters of Wisdom
Automatic Writing / Art
Channeling
Contactees
Direct Voice Phenomena
EVP / ITC
Healing Facilitators
Mediums and Psychics
Metaphysical Aspects of Pop Culture
New Age / Age of Aquarius
Nostradamus
Parallels Between Paranormal Phenomena Cases
Paranormal Letters
Poltergeist Cases
'Possession,' 'Obsession' and 'Attachment'
Precipitated Paintings
Psychic Photography
Reincarnation
Spiritualism
Synchronicity
UFOlogy
Postscript:
This blogger asked Google Gemini a few questions about ancient enchantments.
Q: What were the dark evil forces called in ancient civilizations such as Mesopotamia?
Gemini:
In ancient Mesopotamian civilizations (such as Sumer, Akkad, Babylon, and Assyria), dark or evil forces were generally referred to by generic group terms like utukku or lemnūti (meaning "evil spirits" or "evil demons"). [1, 2]Unlike modern concepts of absolute, specialized evil (like the devil), Mesopotamians viewed these entities as a natural, fluid part of the cosmic order. They were often agents sent by the gods to punish humans or enforce cosmic boundaries. [3, 4, 5, 6]
The primary classifications and individual names for these dark forces include:
1. Classes of Evil Forces
Utukkū (or Utukku): Originally generic spirits, but often classified into utukku lemnūti (evil spirits). They were envisioned as fierce weather spirits, storms, or physical illnesses that could slip through doors and windows. [1, 2, 7, 8]
Galla (or Gallu): The terrifying underworld enforcers. Operating in groups of seven, their sole duty was to ruthlessly hunt down mortals and even rogue deities to drag them down into Irkalla (the land of the dead). [9, 10, 11]
Rābiṣu: Known as "The Lurker". They were humanoid ambush demons that hid in dark corners, waiting to afflict unsuspecting travelers with night terrors or sudden disease. [6, 12]
Lilû and Lilītu: Malevolent wind and storm demons associated with the night. They targeted unwed men and women, causing sexual nightmares and wasting illnesses. [8, 9]
2. Infamous Individual Demonic Figures
Lamashtu: The most dreaded female demon in Mesopotamia. A daughter of the sky god Anu, she was cast out of heaven for her bloodthirsty nature. She walked the earth poisoning rivers, spreading plagues, causing miscarriages, and snatching newborns from their cradles.
Pazuzu: The king of the wind demons. He possessed a canine face, bulging eyes, four wings, and a scorpion tail. Though he commanded destructive storms and famine, Mesopotamians routinely invoked his terrifying power via protective amulets to scare away even worse evils—specifically his fierce rival, Lamashtu.
Asag (or Asakkū): A monstrous entity born from the edge of the world who led an army of rock demons. He brought environmental ruin, made rivers boil, and plagued mankind with piercing head fevers. [2, 6, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]
Would you like to explore how the ancient Mesopotamians physically protected their homes from these spirits, or look at how other civilizations like ancient Egypt classified their forces of darkness?
[4] https://www.historyextra.com
[7] https://africame.factsanddetails.com
[11] https://www.eastdurhamparanormalrg.co.uk
[12] https://crewsproject.wordpress.com
[15] https://www.thecollector.com
[17] https://www.worldhistory.org
Q: Aren't these figures examples of superstitious enchantments?
Gemini:
By modern definitions, yes, these entities are classic examples of superstitious enchantments. From an analytical, historical standpoint, they perfectly bridge the two concepts you just asked about.However, there is a fascinating nuance in how they connect:
1. The Linguistic Connection ("Enchantment")
When we look back at the literal Latin origin of enchantment—incantare, meaning "to cast a spell by singing or chanting magic words"—that is exactly how Mesopotamians interacted with these figures.
To remove a demon like an Utukku or a Rābiṣu, a specialized priest-magician called an āšipu would step in. [1, 2]
They didn't just pray; they recited literal, poetic incantations (spells) from cuneiform tablets like the Utukku Lemnūtu ("Evil Demons") text. They would physically chant to bind, trap, or banish the entities. [1, 3, 4]
They even created physical "enchantments" by burying ceramic Incantation Bowls upside down under thresholds to ensnare these demons like mystical traps. [5, 6]
2. The Cultural View ("Superstition")
While a modern observer views these rituals as superstition (the belief in supernatural causation), the Mesopotamians viewed them as a practical, logical science. [7, 8]
To them, a sudden fever or a baby dying of SIDS wasn't a random tragedy; it was the physical manifestation of Lamashtu slipping through the window. [9, 10]
Using a Pazuzu amulet to scare her away or chanting a spell wasn't a whimsical folk belief—it was the ancient equivalent of medicine, sanitation, and home security combined. [11, 12, 13]
So, while we classify them today as folklore and superstition, to the ancient world, these demons were the very reason why the practice of enchantment and incantation was invented in the first place. [9]
Would you like to see an example of a translated cuneiform incantation used to drive these demons away, or explore how medieval European concepts of "enchantment" evolved from these ancient roots?
[1] https://forum.theonyxpath.com
[2] https://www.phil.uni-wuerzburg.de
[3] https://www.worldhistory.org
[8] https://www.ancient-origins.net
[9] https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
[10] https://africame.factsanddetails.com
[11] https://www.thecollector.com
The demon 'Pazuzu' is a facet of the movie "The Exorcist" (1973) and sequels. Being released this year is "The Exorcist: Martyrs" directed by Mike Flanagan.
These are some of the blog articles profiling the Mark Russell Bell 'paranormal initiation.
"Your Metaphysical Initiation"
"Gaga Manifests New Facets of the Mystery"
"Sharing Diverse Aspects of my 'Paranormal Initiation'"
"Other Incidents of My Unusual Spiritual Awakening"
"This Is the Essential Insight for Considering Oneself to Be a True 'Illuminati'"
