Dissociative Identity Disorder and The God Force

 A variety of scientific reports online identify parallels between 'multiple personality'/'dissociative identity disorder' and 'channeling.'  These photos of what have been known as 'deep trance'/'overshadowing'/'total takeover' 'channelers' are from a 1989 Time-Life book: top left: Jach Pursel channeled 'Lazaris'; top right: 'Cajuba' gave an "interspecies communication between man and dolphin" through Neville Rowe; below right: 'Merlin' spoke through Diana Hoerig to explain: "I am simply a symbolic Archetype of a Force, a power to manipulate nature"; below center: 'Ramtha' with eyes open spoke through the body of JZ Knight; below left: Taryn Krivé channeled an entity of the 'Violet Flame Network'; center: 'John' (the apostle) was in control of Kevin Ryerson. (channeling cases articles index)


This blog article considers data that leads one to reflect about how human conditions termed 'multiple personality disorder' and 'dissociative identity disorder' when placed in perspective may expand our understanding of ourselves in relationship to what has been called 'the God Force' in many blog posts.  'Channeling'/'mediumship' cases that encompass use of the expression 'God Force' include those of Edgar Cayce, Leslie Flint, Eileen Garrett, Helen Greaves, Thomas Jacobson*, JZ Knight*, Gladys Osborne Leonard, Jach Pursel*, Estelle Roberts, Jane Roberts, Pat Rodegast*, Neville Rowe and Kevin Ryerson*. (*contemporary cases)

Documentation of automatic writing offering data relevant to considering the science of human identity is found with the 'Patience Worth'/Pearl Lenore Curran case chronology that has been a subject for four articles at this blog.  Two noteworthy books about this case are Patience Worth: A Psychic Mystery (1916) by Casper S. Yost and The Case of Patience Worth: A Critical Study of Certain Unusual Phenomena (1927) by Walter Franklin Prince, Ph.D.  Prince's book includes Curran's autobiographical articles; witness testimonies; examples of Patience's Worth 'table talk,' poems, impromptu proverbs and prayers; and opinions and reviews. 
 
Prince's Introduction includes a mention of theories about the case—Patience as a 'secondary personality,' as an external intelligence or spirit somehow able to use Curran's brain, and as "an unusual reception of knowledge and power from the 'Cosmic Consciousness'"—before offering the thesis he formulated after studying the data for ten months:

EITHER OUR CONCEPT OF WHAT WE CALL THE SUBCONSCIOUS MUST BE RADICALLY ALTERED, SO AS TO INCLUDE POTENCIES OF WHICH WE HITHERTO HAVE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE, OR ELSE SOME CAUSE OPERATING THROUGH BUT NOT ORIGINATING IN THE SUBCONSCIOUS OF MRS. CURRAN MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED.  In the former case we normalize what hitherto would have seemed "supernormal" (in the same manner as hypnosis, which a hundred years ago was thought to involve a supernormal claim, has been normalized); in the second case we admit the supernormal.

Visioning experiences have also been reported in case studies of multiple personality disorder or what is now termed dissociative identity disorder.  The case study of the "disintegrated personality" (multiple personality) of the individual known as 'Miss Christine L. Beauchamp' was written by her psychiatrist Morton Prince, M.D., LL.D. in The Dissociation of a Personality (1906).  The subject of Prince's study was described by him as "a person in whom several personalities have become developed; that is to say, she may change her personality from time to time, often from hour to hour, and with each change her character becomes transformed and her memories altered."
 
The personality with whom Prince first became acquainted was labeled B I while B III—whom he eventually called 'Sally'—was a coexisting and alternating personality whose experiences weren't known to B I.  Although B III had knowledge of B I and B II (the hypnotic state of B I), Prince observed that 'Sally' retained little of B I's education, such as the knowledge of foreign languages and ability to write shorthand.  He regarded B III/Sally as linked with his patient's subconsciousness as "a subconscious personality."  B III/Sally was observed to have a peculiar form of anesthesia yet Prince found that sensation could temporarily be restored by suggestion.  Other states of his patient chronicled by Prince included B IV and B IV a (the hypnotic self of B IV).  It was found that B III/Sally knew the things that B IV did but not B IV's thoughts.  Prince noted that the hypnotic state itself is a condition of dissociation and in his account of the case he described instances of a form of 'automatic writing' and speech.  One chapter of Prince's book features a portion of 'Sally's autobiography.'  B IV had destroyed the first manuscript eagerly sought by Prince but cooperated to allow portions of it to be reproduced via 'automatic writing.'  Other portions were written by B III/Sally as the waking personality.
 
Many of Prince's deductions about the case were based upon statements of B III/Sally although they were sometimes contradictory.  One example of a contradiction about Sally may be found when Prince reported illusions and 'negative hallucinations' (where there was a failure to hear or see something present) of B 1 and B IV.  He found these phenomena to be based upon a dominant idea or a belief and, in some instances, "plainly the action of subconscious mental states upon the waking consciousness" and thus attributable to B III/Sally having "subconsciously induced" the hallucinations as "visual representations of her own subconscious thoughts"; however, once when Prince asked 'Sally' if she could explain the hallucinations of B IV, she replied, "No, it is a mystery."  He wrote ambiguously about his interpretation of some complex circumstances: "A few days later she confessed her part in the trick . . . Sally further claimed — a point of importance — that she caused only the negative hallucination and had nothing to do with the positive hallucination . . ."
 
Among the chronicled phenomena in The Dissociation of a Personality are 'crystal visions' that Prince heard described by his patient: "It was found possible, by having Miss Beauchamp (B I) gaze steadfastly at an object, — a glass bulb being used for this purpose, — to induce visions, which represented, for the most part, scenes in her past life."  Not only did these visions reveal past experiences or details of them forgotten by B I, some of the details seem to have originally gone unobserved.  In one incident using the glass globe, B I saw a vision of herself walking down a street when she'd intended to remove a letter from her pocket to rid herself of it but mistakenly tore up banknotes instead.  The vision corresponded to the account of the incident given Prince by B III/Sally, who often explained to him B I's circumstances.

When Miss Beauchamp looks into a glass globe she does not see the details of her vision as small objects reflected in the glass, but, after a moment or two the globe and her surroundings disappear from her consciousness, and she sees before her a scene in which she herself is present as a spectator.  It seems to her she is a part of the scene in which human beings, — herself, perhaps one of them, — are enacting parts, as in real life.  The characters are life-size, and act like living persons.

She appears like one who, at a theatre, is completely absorbed by the play, and in that sense is unconscious of surroundings, but not at all in a trance state.  Her absorption and the exceeding mobility and expression of her face give the impression that she is entirely oblivious of all about her, until spoken to, but not as one hypnotized; rather as one who is intensely absorbed in a scene and has forgotten where she is.  Every variety of feeling, timidity, surprise, interest, seems to be expressed by the play of her features, and at times . . . she seems rather frightened by the uncanniness of what she sees. 

Prince noted about his patient and her visions: ". . . while they arise within the field of the personal consciousness, they come and go entirely independently of personal control."  (Another blog article is "In Comparison: Pearl Curran, 'Miss Beauchamp,' John Dee and Edward Kelly")
 
After the personality known as B IV appeared, it was found she had several methods of getting information about "that part of her life when she herself was absent" and one of these was by visions. Prince wrote about B IV:

She discovered that by "fixing her mind," as she called it, she could create a vision of almost any event in which she had taken part, either as herself or in those blank periods of her life when she was B I. These visions were similar in character to the crystal visions which used to be obtained with Miss Beauchamp for purposes of experiment. Unlike Sally, therefore, both personalities were good subjects for these phenomena.  The process of "fixing her mind" consisted in thinking intently, to the extent of absentmindedness, on any subject upon which she wished information, and if it was a scene in which one or other member of the family had played a part, the whole would rise before her like a panorama.

Prince considered B IV's statements to construe the possibility of B IV having experienced anterograde amnesia for six years upon experiencing an emotional shock.  Prince thus found no objection to the possibility of B I being "a quasi-disintegrated somnambulistic person, in spite of the continuity of her memory"; while B III/Sally once wrote "But B IV must be C. (original Christine) rattled, even if I don't know her thoughts, for we are still connected in some way, else I could not make her see and hear things and not see and hear them."  It seems evident that Sally too was attempting to understand her own nature.  Prince eventually concluded that the Real Miss Beauchamp wasn't B IV or B I but the effective fusion of both and noted, ". . . the resurrection of the Real Miss Beauchamp is through the death of Sally."  Prince's case study indicated that when he was successful finding the Real Miss Beauchamp, "Of Sally, her life, and her doings, she knows nothing, excepting indirectly.  Of this part of her mental life she has no more memory than has B I or B IV."
 
These excerpts from The Dissociation of a Personality show the difficulty for a reader determining what understanding about human personality may be derived from such a case study.  Perhaps the best-known biography on this subject is Sybil (1973) by Flora Rheta Schreiber.  The book was written over a period of ten years and offered pictorial evidence of her subject's artistic abilities — a talent documented in other MPD biographies.  Sybil Isabel Dorsett was a pseudonym used for Shirley Ardell Mason (1923-1998) who wanted to maintain anonymity.  Her psychoanalyst was Dr. Cornelia B. Wilbur, who'd met Schreiber when she was psychiatry editor at Science Digest magazine.  Sybil reads more like a novel than a case study.
 
In Sybil, the 15 other personalities in addition to the waking Sybil are determined by Wilbur as belonging to her (so-called) unconscious.  Wilbur was familiar with the hypnotic sessions used by Dr. Prince but, according to Schreiber, "straight psychoanalysis was the treatment of choice in the Dorsett case."  In the epilogue of the book, Dr. Wilbur was reported to have diagnosed and treated six other cases of multiple personality.

Each had a central, or waking, self corresponding to waking Sybil and alternating selves of which the waking self had no knowledge and for whose memories and experiences she (he) was amnesiac.  In each of the six cases there was a 'Vicky' character, who knew everything about all the selves and who served as a memory trace.

Here are some anecdotes from Sybil describing instances where memories were regained —

When Danny said this, Sybil remembered, as if it were a dream, that a girl whom they called Sybil but who wasn't Sybil went with Danny Martin to distribute her grandmother's funeral flowers to the sick and poor of the town.  As in a dream, she remembered watching that girl.  It felt as if she had been beside this other Sybil, just walking along.  And she couldn't be certain whether or not it was a dream.  But although she knew now that time, unaccounted-for time, had passed since the funeral, this was the only memory that came back.  Otherwise there was nothing but emptiness, a great, cavernous emptiness between the moment that a hand had grabbed her at the cemetery and the time that she first found herself in the fifth-grade classroom.

Most disturbing of all, life seemed to be floating by in an unreal kind of way, filled with strange presentiments.  Sybil would remember that she had been somewhere or had done something as if she had dreamed it.  She seemed to be walking beside herself, watching.  And sometimes she couldn't tell the difference between her dreams and this dreamlike unreality
 
At one point in her life Sybil exhibited suicidal intimations.  After the few electric shock treatments effected no discernable difference in her feelings, she agreed to sodium pentothal treatment with pentothal described as "a barbiturate that is both an anesthetic and a hypnotic."  Schreiber wrote: "The freedom Sybil knew through pentothal the other selves also experienced.  Now as never before the others had the opportunity both to be and to talk . . . Only Sybil possessed none of the memories of the others.  But as pentothal unleashed some forgotten fragments of the past, the memories relating to the experiences of the others and the memories of events that Sybil had lived through as herself but had forgotten began to filter into awareness."
 
Perhaps the best-known autobiography about MPD/DID is I'm Eve (1977) by Chris Costner Sizemore and her double cousin Elen Sain Pittillo.  Sizemore's case inspired other books and the movie "The Three Faces of Eve" released in 1957.  Her Author's Note at the beginning of I'm Eve explained that the book was written as personal therapy and documentation as she wanted to make known the true facts of life.  The alternating personalities exhibited differences in handwriting and brain wave patterns.  Early in the book, Sizemore described incidents—some fleeting—during her childhood when she seemed to be watching herself as one would observe a stranger.  Sizemore reflected about her situation: "All of a sudden, without knowing how I got there, I would be someplace watching that other little girl doing something that I had been told not to do . . . But when Mother came, she grabbed me and accused me."
 
In one of her commentaries, Sizemore explained, "There has always been an ugly one, and a naughty one, and one who got the blame for everything; they were not the same ones, they grew and changed, changed in appearance and in actions, so I knew they were not the same ones.  But where was I—Chris—or was I one of them and just can't remember so far back?"
 
On one occasion as a child Sizemore reported having a strange dream that featured Jesus in a flowing white robe telling her that her sister had diphtheria.  Jesus instructed Christine to tell this to her mother and because of the dream a doctor was brought to the home resulting with the diagnosis of diphtheria followed with suitable medical treatment.  Similarly, in the case of Christine Beauchamp, Prince reported that his patient had experienced visions of the Madonna and of Christ yet no words had ever been heard during these visions.
 
As recounted in I'm Eve, during later periods in Sizemore's life there were many occasions when she heard the voices of the mysterious others.  During a miscarriage was heard: "Do something!  Don't just lie there or we're both gonna die."  Soon after that: "You're stupid.  Why do you stay here?  I'm not going to come out in this hole.  You've got to get us out of here!"  Once when a voice told her to snatch the tablecloth and dump the food all over her husband Ralph, Chris did so "without thinking."  On one occasion, a voice ordered, "Cut your wrists!  Pick up the razor blade and cut your wrists!"  Sizemore reported feeling a sharp sting and then observed that she'd sliced her finger.  In comparison, Prince chronicled in his book only one occasion when hearing voices was a factor.
 
In the Sizemore case, the personality called 'Jane' showed access to information through visions.  Jane told her doctor that she knew she wasn't Mrs. White (an alternate personality) because she could see what Mrs. White did.

Her recall was beginning.  She began to feel as if she had suffered a shock of some sort, a minor accident.  Her nervous system quivered, her heart lurched and raced, her stomach knotted, but the pictures continued to kaleidoscope.  She suddenly had much general information—she knew who George Washington was—but she had almost no specific information about herself.  She felt that the pictures were going on around her but not that she was a part of them — they were not happening to her.

Jane "seemed to draw upon a source of information that neither Chris White nor Chris Costner appeared to possess" —

It was as if her educational experiences as Jane extended her knowledge beyond what either of them could have experienced.  On both her and Don's Ice Capades programs she quoted Whittier, "Of all love words of tongue or pen — The saddest are these, 'It might have been!'"  It was inscribed to Don and signed "Chris."  On their Fred Waring program she inscribed "Je aimé vous—mon chêri," and she signed it "Chris."

I'm Eve Authors Chris Costner Sizemore and Elen Sain Pittillo appraised:

These are far from the kinds of words Chris White would have uttered to her unfeeling husband, and they would have reduced raucous, unlearned Chris Costner to scornful laughter; yet Elen majored in English and French at Furman University, and John Greenleaf Whittier's sad poem was one of her favorites.  During Elen's visits to her cousin, when she had rambled on about her college life and the opening vistas of her own mind, she had been filling unborn Jane's storehouse of memories.  And Jane, though her quotation was slightly incorrect and her French badly fractured, was desperately drawing on this skimpy source to strengthen her fragile existence.
 
The publication of I'm Eve was followed 12 years later by another book from Sizemore, A Mind of My Own (1989).  In the preface, Sizemore viewed MPD as "a defense mechanism by which the personality creates other satellites to face realities that appear unbearable."  In early chapters of the book, she described the unification process that she experienced at the age of 47: "Beginning with the age of two, my life passed in review.  Day after day, week after week, era upon era, it was virtually a ceaseless envisioning of who I had been, of those whom my former alters had known, and of the things the alters had done . . . It was as though a river of many currents flowed steadily in my mind; and within these currents, reflections filled with people were also in motion."

Viewing these eras, I could see that during the disorder one alter from a recess of space inside my mind had been able to watch another when she was "out" in the body. However, recall was the reverse.  This time it was as though I were outside of my mind and looking in, watching these memories being replayed on my mind's center stage.

During this period in her life, Sizemore also experienced moments of creativity with paintings and poems that she identified as dissociative states.  She also recounted a series of recurrent dreams set in templelike rooms with tall columns.  Sizemore wrote that in the last of these dreams:

The beautiful circular room fell silent, and my vision of it clouded, as if a veil had fallen between the dream and me, the dreamer.  That's when I awakened.

After that night, I have never felt or seen my alters again.

Sizemore also related events that made her wonder, "Am I the focus of unexplainable psychic disturbances for some reason?"  The most surprising of these incidents occurred when she was preparing to take a shower.

But as I stepped into the shower stall, my foot rested on some soap residue and I slipped.  I could feel my feet sliding out from under me.  Fearing the fall, I panicked.  Just as suddenly, however, I was startled when I felt my body being jerked back into a standing position by what seemed to be a pair of strong hands that lifted me along both sides of my rib cage.

Sizemore regarded her psychic experiences as "a positive aspect to the innate vulnerability—or the proneness for dissociation—that had made me susceptible to the MPD in the first place."  Her conclusions about MPD included the belief that her former alters "were entities, whole in their own rights, who coexisted with my birth personality before I was born.  They were not me, but they remain intrinsically related to what it means to be me."
 
People have different abilities where memory and memorization are concerned.  A book that presented evidence of this is Russian psychologist A.R. Luria's The Mind of a Mnemonist (1968) translated by Lynn Solotaroff.  The object of the case study was Sherashevsky ('S.'), "a man who 'saw' everything" as shown by the investigation of his "exceptional gift for memory" during a period of nearly 30 years.  Luria concluded S's memory was "an innate characteristic, an element of his individuality, and that the techniques he used were merely superimposed on an existing structure and did not 'stimulate' it with devices other than those which were natural to it."
 
The book reveals that many sessions held either days, weeks and years apart induced Luria to observe "it appeared that there was no limit either to the capacity of S.'s memory or to the durability of the traces he retained.  Experiments indicated that he had no difficulty reproducing any lengthy series or words whatever, even though these had originally been presented to him a week, a month, a year, or even many years earlier."
 
Some tests of his retention were given S. without warning 15 or 16 years after the first session when he had originally recalled the words with invariable success.  At this latter time, S. had become a well-known performing professional mnemonist who had to remember thousands of word series that made the feat seem even more remarkable.
 
Luria (sometimes spelled Luriia) wrote: "In S.'s case every sound he heard immediately produced an experience of light and color and . . . a sense of taste and touch as well."  The memory ability of S. was found to involve converting a series of words into a series of graphic images and therefore he could readily reproduce a series from start to finish or in reverse order.

It was this technique of recalling material graphically that explained why S. always insisted a series be read clearly and distinctly, that the words not be read off too quickly.  For he needed some time, however slight, to convert the words into images.

In a record from 1935, S. was quoted:

Formerly, in order to remember a thing, I would have to summon up an image of the whole scene.  Now all I have to do is take some detail I've decided on in advance that will signify the whole image.  Say I'm given the word horseman.  All it takes now is an image of a foot in a spur.  Earlier, if I'd been given the word restaurant, I'd have seen the entrance to the restaurant, people sitting inside, a Rumanian orchestra tuning up, and a lot else . . . Now if I'm given the word, I'd see something rather like a store and an entranceway with a bit of something white showing from inside—that's all, and I'd remember the word.  So my images have changed quite a bit.  Earlier they were more clear-cut, more realistic.  The ones I have now are not as well defined or as vivid as the earlier ones . . . I try just to single out one detail I'll need in order to remember a word.

Visioning was a component of S.'s memory.

When S. Read a passage from a text, each word produced an image.  As he put it: "other people think as they read, but I see it all."  As soon as he began a phrase, images would appear; as he read further, still more images were evoked, and so on.

S.'s memory was estimated to be different from cases of 'photographic' or 'eidetic' memory as his memory involved spontaneous recall.  During a period in his life when he was demonstrating his memory in public performances, S. became upset about not being able to forget useless information.  He realized that if he didn't want a chart of numbers to show up it wouldn't and this made him feel "free." 

Luria found that although S. could operate quickly and simply by means of his "inner vision," the use of verbal-logical means would entail supplementary abstract calculations that required a more lengthy reasoning process.  S. divulged that reading induced remembered images and he would lose the gist of what he was reading.  Other difficulties were observed.  A sentence such has "The work got under way normally" baffled him.  S. also showed that he couldn't understand the idea contained in the sentence "If carbon dioxide is present above a vessel, the greater its pressure, the faster it dissolves in water."
 
S. demonstrated that he was able to use visualization techniques to alter his physical state, accelerating and then decreasing his pulse rate during one demonstration and in another simultaneously increasing the temperature of his right hand by two degrees and decreasing the temperature of his left hand by two degrees.  He also described his methods to avoid experiencing pain.

Let's say I'm going to the dentist. You know how pleasant it is to sit there and let him drill your teeth.  I used to be afraid to go.  But now it's all so simple. I sit there and when the pain starts I feel it . . . it's a tiny, orange-red thread . . . I'm upset because I know that if this keeps up, the thread will widen until it turns into a dense mass . . . So I cut the thread, make it smaller and smaller, until it's just a tiny point.  And the pain disappears.
 
Later I tried a different method.  I'd sit in the chair but imagine it wasn't really me but someone else.

In the Introduction of the book, Luria wrote that he was interested in what effects a remarkable capacity for memory had on other major aspects of personality.

Such an approach to the study of psychic phenomena is hardly typical of scientific psychology, which deals for the most part with sensation and perception, attention and memory, thinking and emotion, but only rarely considers how the entire structure of an individual's personality may hinge on the development of one of those features of psychic activity.

Two books that investigate verbal or auditory hallucinations are Voices of Reason, Voices of Insanity: Studies of verbal hallucinations (2000) by Ivan Leudar and Phillip Thomas; and Muses, Madmen and Prophets: Rethinking the History, Science and Meaning of Auditory Hallucination (2007) by Daniel B. Smith.  Leudar and Thomas's book provides profiles of historical and contemporary voice hearers to show that hearing voices in itself doesn't indicate mental illness.  Smith's book proposes an alternative name for the phenomenon often known as auditory hallucination—"voice-hearing"—with the conclusion that these voices for those who hear them will always be, by virtue of their presence, real.
 
Here's an excerpt from my blog article "Hearing Voices: A Common Human Experience" —
 
This blogger once discussed experiences of anomalous voice-hearing with a friend and co-worker, Sharon (a nurse).  She told me that one day in August 2006 her friend Tom was driving her home from his brother-in-law's house where she'd adopted a puppy.  She was sitting in the front passenger seat of his truck when she heard a firm masculine voice in her right ear near the closed window.  The voice spoke after Tom asked her what she was going to name the puppy.  The voice told her "Julie — Julie."  Sharon said to me that hearing the voice induced her to laugh at the time because she was reminded of an earlier occasion in her life before her husband's death.  Her husband had been born in Egypt and spoke with a French accent because his mother was French.  He'd bestowed the name (spelled phonetically) 'Cat-ee' on a pet feline and when she'd asked him how to spell it he'd replied, "C — A — T — H — Y, of course."  In the truck, Sharon responded to the uncanny voice by saying, "Okay, how are you going to spell it?"  The voice answered: "J — U — L — E — E, of course." 
 
There had been a single previous occasion when she experienced a similar situation in May 2004 while preparing to place her mother in a nursing home for Alzheimer's patients.  One Sunday after visiting a nursing home and finding this to be a suitable facility for her mother, Sharon remembered feeling anxiety about her mother's unstable mental condition and then heard a voice say, "Go call the home."  She left a message not expecting to receive a response until the following day but she soon heard the voice again: "She's calling you back now."  The telephone rang and the owner of the nursing home asked Sharon, "Can you bring her now?"  I asked Sharon if she'd noticed during the two occasions if the unattributable voice had spoken with an accent.  She told me that she hadn’t noticed any accent.
 
*  
 
Considering dissociative identity disorder and 'The God Force,' what is puzzling and subject to individual interpretation are the chronology of interactions (unprecedented in many was considering all other known transcendental case chronologies) recounted by myself at the My Life with Michael journal blog with 110 entries during 2021 and 2022.  The shocking and emotionally devastating incidents constituting the 'new paranormal initiation' that commenced in May last year thereafter motivated 68 articles at this blog in 2022 (listed articles with links), beginning with "A New Paranormal Initiation to 'God' and 'The Devil' Is Chronicled by Mark Russell Bell".  In that post I reported as a metaphysical journalist: 

The latest development in Mark Russell Bell's paranormal interaction is his dealing with the shocking emergence of the 'God Alter Ego' usually called 'The Devil.'  The 'paranormal phenomena' that began manifesting in proximity to Mark Russell Bell in 1995 was first documented with the 1997 paranormal case study Testament. 

Bell comments: "If the Alter Ego of an actual 'Devil' or metaphorical 'Devil' becomes any more pronounced, 'End Time' beliefs being fulfilled would be nearly insurmountable for humanity.  I've been thinking about social developments in recent years, including the war overseas and cultural programming of military assumed imperatives, the ongoing worldwide pandemic, 'corporate thinking,' social unrest and people accustomed to focusing their attention on mainstream media without knowing that there's credible evidence for the human afterlife and spiritual dispensations of The Devil's former Alter Ego that are ignored or overlooked by most contemporary people.  Learning about the case chronologies and 'proof' regarding these subjects in hundreds of noncommercial Metaphysical Articles blog posts with photographic evidence offers opportunities for expanding one's understanding of life."
 

 
Previous
Previous

Heart Transplants and the Soul: A Current Perspective

Next
Next

Dissociative Identity Disorder Phenomena: Two Current Perspectives